<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Dr. Diego A. Porto]]></title><description><![CDATA[Especialistas en neurocirugía y patologías espinales, brindamos atención personalizada y de vanguardia para mejorar la vida de nuestros pacientes.]]></description><link>https://www.drporto.com/blog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 17:37:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.drporto.com/en/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm: Clipping vs. Endovascular Treatment]]></title><description><![CDATA[Microsurgical clipping or endovascular treatment? For unruptured aneurysms, the only specific randomized trial is CURES. In it, treatment failure at one year was 9% with clipping versus 19% with endovascular treatment, with the same overall morbidity and mortality at one year. Clipping involves more invasiveness at the outset, with more transient neurological deficits and longer hospital stays. In return it offers highly durable occlusion: 98.6% recurrence-free at 15 years. Endovascular...]]></description><link>https://www.drporto.com/en/entrada/unruptured-intracranial-aneurysm-clipping-vs-endovascular-treatment</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aca44f309c1023b681a9459</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:55:07 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/58f9cf_5f87ec68c8c243f58c6b591d284835ba~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_185,h_185,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>Dr. Diego Porto</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Great Paradox of the Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm]]></title><description><![CDATA[We have never detected or treated as many unruptured intracranial aneurysms as we do today. Yet subarachnoid hemorrhage is becoming less frequent and less lethal: its incidence fell from 10.2 to 6.1 per 100,000 between 1980 and 2010, and case fatality dropped from 51% to 35%. The paradox has another side: most aneurysms never rupture (the average annual risk is below 1%), but most of those that do rupture are small, the ones we usually call «low risk». Moreover, the decline in hemorrhage...]]></description><link>https://www.drporto.com/en/entrada/the-great-paradox-of-the-unruptured-intracranial-aneurysm</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aca445586e1da51f6ff1efa</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:54:23 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/58f9cf_5f87ec68c8c243f58c6b591d284835ba~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_185,h_185,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>Dr. Diego Porto</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Aneurisma cerebral no roto: clipado vs. tratamiento endovascular]]></title><description><![CDATA[¿Clipado microquirúrgico o tratamiento endovascular? Para los aneurismas no rotos, el único ensayo aleatorizado específico es CURES. En él, la falla de tratamiento a un año fue de 9% con clipado frente a 19% con endovascular, con la misma morbimortalidad global al año. El clipado implica más invasividad al inicio, con más déficit neurológico transitorio y más días de internación. A cambio ofrece una oclusión muy durable: 98,6% libre de recurrencia a 15 años. El endovascular, en cambio, exige...]]></description><link>https://www.drporto.com/entrada/aneurisma-cerebral-no-roto-clipado-vs-tratamiento-endovascular</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aca3eaa09c1023b681a88b2</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:53:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/58f9cf_5f87ec68c8c243f58c6b591d284835ba~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_185,h_185,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>Dr. Diego Porto</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[La gran paradoja del aneurisma cerebral no roto]]></title><description><![CDATA[Nunca detectamos ni tratamos tantos aneurismas cerebrales no rotos como hoy. Sin embargo, la hemorragia subaracnoidea es cada vez menos frecuente y menos letal: su incidencia cayó de 10,2 a 6,1 por 100.000 entre 1980 y 2010, y su letalidad bajó del 51% al 35%. La paradoja tiene otra cara: la mayoría de los aneurismas nunca se rompe (el riesgo anual promedio está por debajo del 1%), pero la mayoría de los que se rompen son pequeños, los que solemos llamar «de bajo riesgo». Además, el descenso...]]></description><link>https://www.drporto.com/entrada/la-gran-paradoja-del-aneurisma-cerebral-no-roto</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6aca38a7b89f0f638e3fada9</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 14:52:36 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://static.wixstatic.com/media/58f9cf_5f87ec68c8c243f58c6b591d284835ba~mv2.png/v1/fit/w_185,h_185,al_c,q_80/file.png" length="0" type="image/png"/><dc:creator>Dr. Diego Porto</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>